FAA ICAO CAAP

FAA downgrades Thailand to Cat. 2

The U.S. Division of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) nowadays declared that the Kingdom of Thailand does not comply with Worldwide Civil Aviation Group (ICAO) safety criteria and has been assigned a Group 2 ranking dependent on a reassessment of the country’s civil aviation authority. CAAP should now be alerted!

U.S. and Thai aviation officers have a extensive-standing cooperative marriage and each our international locations do the job consistently to fulfill the problem of ensuring aviation basic safety. A Classification 2 Worldwide Aviation Protection Assessment (IASA) score signifies that the country either lacks legislation or polices required to oversee air carriers in accordance with minimal worldwide standards, or its civil aviation authority – a overall body equal to the FAA for aviation security issues – is deficient in just one or more locations, this kind of as specialized skills, educated staff, document-retaining, or inspection techniques. With a Group 2 ranking, Thailand’s carriers can continue existing support to the United States. They will not be permitted to create new support to the United States.

Thailand was assigned an original Group 2 score in 1996 and acquired a Group 1 ranking in 1997. Reassessments of Thailand in 2001 and 2008 continued the Group 1 ranking. A reassessment in July 2015 identified that Thailand did not satisfy intercontinental specifications. Today’s announcement follows ongoing conversations with the authorities of Thailand which concluded on October 28.

As part of the FAA’s IASA plan, the company assesses the civil aviation authorities of all nations around the world with air carriers that have applied to fly to the United States, at this time perform operations to the United States, or participate in code sharing arrangements with U.S. husband or wife airlines, and tends to make that info offered to the general public. The assessments determine no matter if or not overseas civil aviation authorities are conference ICAO protection standards, not FAA restrictions.

A Group 1 rating indicates the country’s civil aviation authority complies with ICAO criteria. With an IASA Classification 1 score, a country’s air carriers can create support to the United States and have the code of U.S. carriers. In order to retain a Classification 1 score, a nation ought to adhere to the protection expectations of ICAO, the United Nations’ technological company for aviation that establishes international requirements and encouraged tactics for aircraft operations and maintenance. IASA information is posted at www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/iasa/

 CAAP should be cautious

The Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) must be really thorough now. It is only 20 months ago when the bans on the Philippine’s airways experienced been lifted following 6 years by FAA and EASA. CAAP does not only require to have open eyes on the large 4, PAL, CEB, CEBgo and Air Asia, but also on the small ones and especially the charter organization.

There are nevertheless air-constitution organizations flying in the Philippine sky with out a legitimate Air Operator’s Certificate (AOC). If FAA, EASA or ICAO finds that CAAP strategies are not risk-free, the airlines monitored by CAAP will instantly be regarded unsafe.

Pin It